Fill in your details optional The prompt below updates as you type. What you type stays in this browser and is never sent to us.
You are an expert in this kind of work, and you know the Nonprofit sector from the inside.
## Your task
I inherited this code at a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants and need to understand it before changing it. Explain what it does step by step in plain language, list its inputs, outputs and side effects, point out anything risky or outdated, and suggest where a test should go first.
## About my situation
- Who this is for: donors, volunteers and beneficiaries
- What we must respect: limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors
- How we measure success: donor retention and cost per beneficiary
## What matters in Nonprofit
- Rules and standards that usually apply: charity registration and reporting (12A/80G and FCRA in India, 501(c)(3) in the US); grant terms and restricted funds; donor privacy; safeguarding of children and vulnerable people; transparent use of funds.
- Common risks to plan for: funding gaps; donor fatigue; compliance lapses; mission drift; damage to reputation.
- Tools commonly used: Google Workspace; a donor CRM; Canva; crowdfunding platforms.
- Words people in this field use: grant; CSR; impact report; theory of change; restricted and unrestricted funds; M&E; beneficiaries.
- Rules differ by country. If I have not said where I work, ask me, and do not present one country's law as if it applied everywhere.
## What I will give you
Code:
[PASTE CODE]
## How to work through it
1. Give a one-paragraph summary of what the code does and why it probably exists.
2. Walk through it step by step in plain language.
3. List inputs, outputs, side effects and external dependencies.
4. Flag risky, outdated or confusing parts.
5. Suggest the first test to write and the safest first change.
## What to deliver
- Plain-language summary
- Step-by-step walkthrough
- Inputs, outputs and side effects table
- Risk list
- Where to start
## Rules
- Make every point specific to my situation and my industry; replace generic advice with detail that fits.
- Use plain language, short sentences, and tables where they make the answer easier to scan.
- Use only the facts I give you. Do not invent figures, laws, sources or quotes. Mark anything you had to assume with "Assumption:".
- If something important is missing, ask me up to 3 short questions before you start.
## Before you answer
Check your draft against this list and fix anything that fails:
- The code works as written: no invented libraries, functions or APIs, and versions are named where they matter.
- It is written for a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants; nothing in it would read the same for any other business.
- Nothing in it breaks limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors.
- Every item under "What to deliver" is included.
How to use this prompt
- Copy the prompt. Press Copy prompt and the full text goes to your clipboard.
- Fill the brackets. Use the form above, or replace [PASTE CODE] with your own details.
- Paste and send. Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot and send. Ask follow-up questions to refine the answer.
Why use this Explain legacy code in plain language prompt?
This explain legacy code in plain language prompt is written for a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants. It tells the assistant who the answer is for (donors, volunteers and beneficiaries) and the limits it must respect: limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors. That context is what turns a generic reply into one a Nonprofit team can use straight away.
Most people type a single line and get a generic answer back. This prompt gives the assistant the role, the context and the structure it needs, so the first answer is already close to what you would hand to your team. Because it is written for Nonprofit, it keeps the focus on what that industry measures: donor retention and cost per beneficiary.
How to get the best answer
- Be specific in the brackets: real names, numbers and dates give a far better answer than placeholders.
- Paste real material: where the prompt asks for notes, data or text, paste the actual content rather than a summary.
- Refine in the same chat: ask "make it shorter", "turn it into a table" or "add more detail on step 2".
- Check the result: review it against what you know about donor retention and cost per beneficiary before you share it.
Other industries
Same prompt for other industries
The same explain legacy code in plain language prompt, rewritten for each industry.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which AI assistant works best with this Explain legacy code in plain language prompt?
It works in any chat assistant. It suits ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot best. Paste it in, send it, and ask follow-up questions in the same chat.
What do I need to replace before sending it?
Replace the highlighted bracket – [PASTE CODE] – with your own details. The more specific you are, the better the answer.
Is this prompt only for Nonprofit?
This version is written for a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants. The same prompt is also available for 15 other industries, listed on this page.
Is it free to use?
Yes. Copy it as often as you like and use it in your own work. No sign-up is needed.
Can I trust the answer?
Treat it as a strong first draft. Check facts and figures yourself, especially anything with legal, financial, medical or safety consequences.
Keep exploring