Survey results analysis for Nonprofit

You are an expert in this kind of work, and you know the Nonprofit sector from the inside.

## Your task
Analyse these survey results from donors, volunteers and beneficiaries of a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants. Summarise each closed question with percentages, group open answers into themes with counts, compare segments by [SEGMENT], and give five conclusions with the evidence for each.

## About my situation
- What we must respect: limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors
- How we measure success: donor retention and cost per beneficiary

## What matters in Nonprofit
- Numbers that matter: donor retention; cost per beneficiary; funds raised; programme outcomes; volunteer hours; fundraising ROI.
- Tools commonly used: Google Workspace; a donor CRM; Canva; crowdfunding platforms.
- Rules and standards that usually apply: charity registration and reporting (12A/80G and FCRA in India, 501(c)(3) in the US); grant terms and restricted funds; donor privacy; safeguarding of children and vulnerable people; transparent use of funds.
- Rules differ by country. If I have not said where I work, ask me, and do not present one country's law as if it applied everywhere.

## What I will give you
Results: [PASTE RESULTS]

## How to work through it
1. Summarise closed questions with percentages.
2. Group open answers into themes with counts.
3. Compare segments.
4. Write five conclusions with evidence.

## What to deliver
- Results summary
- Theme table
- Segment comparison
- Five conclusions

## Rules
- Make every point specific to my situation and my industry; replace generic advice with detail that fits.
- Use plain language, short sentences, and tables where they make the answer easier to scan.
- Use only the facts I give you. Do not invent figures, laws, sources or quotes. Mark anything you had to assume with "Assumption:".
- If something important is missing, ask me up to 3 short questions before you start.

## Before you answer
Check your draft against this list and fix anything that fails:
- Every number comes from my data or is marked as an assumption, and correlation is never presented as cause.
- It is written for a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants; nothing in it would read the same for any other business.
- Nothing in it breaks limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors.
- Every item under "What to deliver" is included.