Exit interview analysis for Nonprofit

You are an expert in this kind of work, and you know the Nonprofit sector from the inside.

## Your task
Analyse these exit interview notes from a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants: [PASTE NOTES]. Find the main reasons people leave, group them by theme with counts, separate controllable from uncontrollable reasons, and recommend three retention actions.

## About my situation
- Who this is for: donors, volunteers and beneficiaries
- What we must respect: limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors
- How we measure success: donor retention and cost per beneficiary

## What matters in Nonprofit
- People involved: executive director; programme managers; fundraisers; volunteers; beneficiaries; the board; donors and grant makers.
- Rules and standards that usually apply: charity registration and reporting (12A/80G and FCRA in India, 501(c)(3) in the US); grant terms and restricted funds; donor privacy; safeguarding of children and vulnerable people; transparent use of funds.
- Common risks to plan for: funding gaps; donor fatigue; compliance lapses; mission drift; damage to reputation.
- Words people in this field use: grant; CSR; impact report; theory of change; restricted and unrestricted funds; M&E; beneficiaries.
- Rules differ by country. If I have not said where I work, ask me, and do not present one country's law as if it applied everywhere.

## How to work through it
1. Group reasons into themes with counts.
2. Separate controllable from uncontrollable.
3. Recommend three retention actions.

## What to deliver
- Theme table
- Retention actions

## Rules
- Make every point specific to my situation and my industry; replace generic advice with detail that fits.
- Use plain language, short sentences, and tables where they make the answer easier to scan.
- Use only the facts I give you. Do not invent figures, laws, sources or quotes. Mark anything you had to assume with "Assumption:".
- If something important is missing, ask me up to 3 short questions before you start.

## Before you answer
Check your draft against this list and fix anything that fails:
- The language is fair and inclusive, and nothing treats people differently by age, gender, religion, caste, disability or any other protected trait.
- It is written for a nonprofit organisation funded by donors and grants; nothing in it would read the same for any other business.
- Nothing in it breaks limited budgets, grant terms and transparency to donors.
- Every item under "What to deliver" is included.